Providing estimated accuracy of mobile station synchronization and mobile station transmission offset to the network

ABSTRACT

A mobile station (MS), a base station subsystem (BSS), and various methods are described herein that enable a positioning node (e.g., Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC)) to improve the accuracy of estimating a position of the mobile station.

CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/799,037 filed on Oct. 31, 2017, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. Nos. 62/415,990, 62/419,794, and 62/433,672 respectively filed on Nov. 1, 2016, Nov. 9, 2016, and Dec. 13, 2016. The entire contents of these documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

This application is related to the co-filed U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 15/798,928 and 15/798,952, each entitled “Providing Estimated Accuracy of Mobile Station Synchronization to the Network”, each of which claim the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/415,990, filed on Nov. 1, 2016. The entire contents of these documents are hereby incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates generally to the wireless telecommunications field and, more particularly, to a mobile station (MS), a base station subsystem (BSS), and various methods that enable a positioning node (e.g., Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC)) to improve the accuracy of estimating a position of the mobile station.

BACKGROUND

The following abbreviations are herewith defined, at least some of which are referred to within the following description of the present disclosure.

-   3GPP 3rd-Generation Partnership Project -   APDU Application Protocol Data Unit -   AGCH Access Grant Channel -   ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit -   BSS Base Station Subsystem -   BBSLAP Base Station Subsystem Location Services Assistance Protocol -   BSSMAP Base Station Subsystem Mobile Application Part -   BSSMAP-LE BSSMAP-Location Services Extension -   BTS Base Transceiver Station -   CN Core Network -   DSP Digital Signal Processor -   EC Extended Coverage -   EC-AGCH Extended Coverage Access Grant Channel -   EC-GSM Extended Coverage Global System for Mobile Communications -   EC-PDTCH Extended Coverage-Packet Data Traffic Channel -   EC-RACH Extended Coverage-Random Access Channel -   EC-SCH Extended Coverage-Synchronization Channel -   EDGE Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution -   EGPRS Enhanced General Packet Radio Service -   eMTC Enhanced Machine Type Communications -   eNB Evolved Node B -   FCCH Frequency Correction Channel -   GSM Global System for Mobile Communications -   GERAN GSM/EDGE Radio Access Network -   GPRS General Packet Radio Service -   IE Information Element -   IoT Internet of Things -   LAC Location Area Code -   LTE Long-Term Evolution -   MCC Mobile Country Code -   MME Mobility Management Entity -   MNC Mobile Network Code -   MS Mobile Station -   MTA Multilateration Timing Advance -   MTC Machine Type Communications -   NB-IoT Narrow Band Internet of Things -   PDN Packet Data Network -   PDU Protocol Data Unit -   PLMN Public Land Mobile Network -   RACH Random Access Channel -   RAN Radio Access Network -   RLC Radio Link Control -   SCH Synchronization Channel -   SGSN Serving GPRS Support Node -   SMLC Serving Mobile Location Center -   TA Timing Advance -   TBF Temporary Block Flow -   TLLI Temporary Logical Link Identifier -   TS Technical Specification -   TSG Technical Specification Group -   UE User Equipment -   UL Uplink -   UMTS Universal Mobile Telephony System -   WCDMA Wideband Code Division Multiple Access -   WiMAX Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access

At the 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Technical Specification Group (TSG) Radio Access Network (RAN) Meeting #72, a Work Item on “Positioning Enhancements for GERAN” was approved (see RP-161260; Busan, Korea; 13-16 Jun. 2016—the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), wherein one candidate method for realizing improved accuracy when determining the position of a mobile station (MS) is timing advance (TA) multilateration (see RP-161034; Busan, Korea; 13-16 Jun. 2016—the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference), which relies on establishing the MS position based on TA values in multiple cells.

At the 3GPP TSG-RAN1 Meeting #86, a proposal based on a similar approach was made also to support positioning of Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) mobiles (see R1-167426; Gothenburg, Sweden; 22-26 Aug. 2016—the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference).

TA is a measure of the propagation delay between a base transceiver station (BTS) and the MS, and since the speed by which radio waves travel is known, the distance between the BTS and the MS can be derived. Further, if the TA applicable to the MS is measured within multiple BTSs and the positions of these BTSs are known, the position of the MS can be derived using the measured TA values. The measurement of the TA requires that the MS synchronize to each neighbor BTS and transmit a signal time-aligned with the estimated timing of the downlink channel received from each BTS. The BTS measures the time difference between its own time reference for the downlink channel, and the timing of the received signal (transmitted by the MS). This time difference is equal to two times the propagation delay between the BTS and the MS (one propagation delay of the BTS's synchronization signal sent on the downlink channel to the MS, plus one equal propagation delay of the signal transmitted by the MS back to the BTS).

Once the set of TA values are established using a set of one or more BTSs during a given positioning procedure, the position of the MS can be derived through so called multilateration wherein the position of the MS is determined by the intersection of a set of hyperbolic curves associated with each BTS (see FIG. 1). The calculation of the position of the MS is typically carried out by a serving positioning node (i.e., serving Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC)), which implies that all of the derived TA and associated BTS position information needs to be sent to the positioning node (i.e., the serving SMLC) that initiated the positioning procedure.

Referring to FIG. 1 (PRIOR ART) there is shown a diagram of an exemplary wireless communication network 100 used to help explain a problem associated with the traditional multilateration process in determining a position of a mobile station 102 (MS 102). The exemplary wireless communication network 100 has several nodes which are shown and defined herein as follows:

-   -   Foreign BTS 104 ₃: A BTS 104 ₃ (shown as foreign BTS3 104 ₃)         associated with a BSS 106 ₃ (shown as non-serving BSS3 106 ₃)         that uses a positioning node 108 ₂ (shown as non-serving SMLC2         108 ₂) that is different from a positioning node (shown as         serving SMLC1 108 ₁) which is used by the BSS 106 ₁ (shown as         serving BSS1 106 ₁) that manages the cell serving the MS 102         when the positioning (multilateration) procedure is initiated.         The derived TA information (TA3 114 ₃) and identity of the         corresponding cell are relayed by the BSS 106 ₃ (shown as         non-serving BSS3 106 ₃), the SGSN 110 (core network), and the         BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁) to the serving         positioning node (shown as serving SMLC1 108 ₁) (i.e., in this         case the non-serving BSS3 106 ₃ has no context for the MS 102).         The BSS 106 ₃ (shown as non-serving BSS3 106 ₃) can be         associated with one or more BTSs 104 ₃ (only one shown) and a         BSC 112 ₃ (shown as non-serving BSC3 112 ₃).     -   Local BTS 104 ₂: A BTS 104 ₂ (shown as local BTS2 104 ₂)         associated with a BSS 106 ₂ (shown as non-serving BSS2 106 ₂)         that uses the same positioning node 108 ₁ (shown as serving         SMLC1 108 ₁) as the BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁) that         manages the cell serving the MS 102 when the positioning         (multilateration) procedure is initiated. The derived TA         information (TA2 114 ₂) and identity of the corresponding cell         are relayed by the BSS 106 ₂ (shown as non-serving BSS2 106 ₂)         and the BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁) to the serving         positioning node (shown as serving SMLC1 108 ₁) (i.e., in this         case the non-serving BSS2 106 ₂ has no context for the MS 102)         (i.e., inter-BSS communications allows the non-serving BSS2 106         ₂ to relay the derived TA information (TA2 114 ₂) and the         identity of the corresponding cell to the serving BSS1 106 ₁).         The BSS 106 ₂ (shown as non-serving BSS2 106 ₂) can be         associated with one or more BTSs 104 ₂ (only one shown) and a         BSC 112 ₂ (shown as non-serving BSC2 112 ₂).     -   Serving BTS 104 ₁: A BTS 104 ₁ (shown as serving BTS1 104 ₁)         associated with a BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁) that         manages the cell serving the MS 102 when the positioning         (multilateration) procedure is initiated. The derived TA         information (TA1 114 ₁) and identity of the corresponding cell         are sent directly by the BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁)         to the serving positioning node 108 ₁ (shown as serving SMLC1         108 ₁) (i.e., in this case the serving BSS1 106 ₁ has a context         for the MS 102). The BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁) can         be associated with one or more BTSs 104 ₁ (only one shown) and a         BSC 112 ₁ (shown as serving BSC1 112 ₁).     -   Serving SMLC 108 ₁: The SMLC 108 ₁ (shown as serving SMLC1 108         ₁) that commands the MS 102 to perform the positioning         (multilateration) procedure (i.e., the SMLC 108 ₁ sends a Radio         Resource Location services Protocol (RRLP) Multilateration         Request to the MS 102).     -   Serving BSS 106 ₁: The BSS 106 ₁ (shown as serving BSS1 106 ₁)         associated with the serving BTS 104 ₁ (shown as serving BTS1 104         ₁) (i.e., the BSS 106 ₁ that has context information for the         Temporary Logical Link Identity (TLLI) corresponding to the MS         102 for which the positioning (multilateration) procedure has         been triggered).     -   Non-serving BSS 106 ₂ and 106 ₃: A BSS 106 ₃ (shown as         non-serving BSS3 106 ₃) associated with a foreign BTS 104 ₃         (shown as foreign BTS3 104 ₃) and a BSS 106 ₂ (shown as         non-serving BSS2 106 ₂) associated with a local BTS 104 ₂ (shown         as local BTS2 104 ₂) (i.e., the BSSs 106 ₂ and 106 ₃ do not have         context information for the TLLI corresponding to the MS 102 for         which the positioning (multilateration) procedure has been         triggered).

Note 1: FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary multilateration process involving three BTSs 104 ₁, 104 ₂, and 104 ₃ associated with three timing advance (TA) values 114 ₁, 114 ₂, 114 ₃ for a particular MS 102. The multilateration can involve more than three BTSs 104 ₁, 104 ₂, and 104 ₃ and more than three TA values 114 ₁, 114 ₂, 114 ₃.

Note 2: FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary wireless communication network 100 showing the basic nodes which are needed to explain the positioning (multilateration) process. It should be appreciated that the exemplary wireless communication network 100 includes additional nodes which are well known in the art.

It is advantageous for the serving SMLC 108 ₁ to estimate the accuracy of the estimated position of the MS 102. The accuracy of the estimated position of the MS 102 depends on the number of cell specific TA estimates 114 ₁, 114 ₂, 114 ₃ (for example) it has been provided with, the accuracy of the individual (cell specific) TA estimates 114 ₁, 114 ₂, 114 ₃ (for example) performed by the BTSs 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ (for example) as well as the MS-BTS geometry, i.e., the true position of the MS 102 relative to the involved BTSs 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ (for example). The accuracy of the TA estimation performed by a BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ in turn depends on the accuracy by which the MS 102 is able to time its uplink (UL) transmissions to the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ according to signals received from the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ (i.e., the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy), and the accuracy by which the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ is able to measure the timing of signals received from the MS 102 (i.e., the BTS Timing Advance Accuracy). The accuracy by which the MS 102 is able to time its uplink transmissions to the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ according to signals received from the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ may be specified as a worst-case tolerance. For example, a Global System for Mobile telephony (GSM) MS 102 is required to time its uplink transmission to the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ signal with a tolerance of ±1.0 symbol period (a symbol period being 48/13 μs), see 3GPP Technical Specification (TS) 45.010 V13.3.0 (2016 September)—the contents of this disclosure are incorporated herein by reference—from which the excerpt below is taken:

-   -   “The MS shall time its transmissions to the BTS according to         signals received from the BTS. The MS transmissions to the BTS,         measured at the MS antenna, shall be 468,75-TA normal symbol         periods (i.e. 3 timeslots-TA) behind the transmissions received         from the BTS, where TA is the last timing advance received from         the current serving BTS. The tolerance on these timings shall be         ±1 normal symbol period.”

One problem with the existing solution is that the serving SMLC 108 ₁ does not have any information about the TA estimation accuracy of the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ or about the actual accuracy with which the MS 102 is able to time its uplink transmission to the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ according to signals received from the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃. If the serving SMLC 108 ₁ receives cell specific TA information as determined by the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ and assumes that the accuracy by which the MS 102 is able to time its uplink transmission to the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ according to signals received from the BTS 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ for that cell is according to the specified worst case tolerance, the estimated accuracy of the estimated position of the MS 102 may be overly pessimistic. Therefore, services requiring a higher positioning accuracy may not be provided with a positioning estimate (i.e., the serving SMLC 108 ₁ may conclude that it cannot realize the target positioning accuracy) even though the actual positioning accuracy may in fact be better than estimated and therefore sufficient. Alternatively, the serving SMLC 108 ₁ may involve more BTSs 104 ₁, 104 ₂, 104 ₃ than are necessary in the positioning process in order to guarantee sufficient accuracy in the estimated position of the MS 102. These problems and other problems are addressed by the present disclosure.

SUMMARY

A mobile station, a base station subsystem (BSS) and various methods for addressing the aforementioned problems are described in the independent claims. Advantageous embodiments of the mobile station, the BSS and the various methods are further described in the dependent claims.

In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a mobile station configured to interact with a BSS, wherein the BSS includes a BTS. The mobile station comprises a processor and a memory that stores processor-executable instructions, wherein the processor interfaces with the memory to execute the processor-executable instructions, whereby the mobile station is operable to perform a receive operation, an estimate operation, and a transmit operation. In the receive operation, the mobile station receives, from the BSS, a multilateration request. In the estimate operation, the mobile station in response to the receipt of the multilateration request (i) estimates a synchronization accuracy with the BTS, and (ii) estimates a transmission offset for uplink transmissions to the BTS. In the transmit operation, the mobile station transmits, to the BSS, a RLC data block that includes at least (i) a TLLI of the mobile station, (ii) the estimated synchronization accuracy, and (iii) the estimated transmission offset (note: the BSS subsequently relays this information to the SMLC). An advantage of the mobile station performing these operations is that it enables a SMLC to make a better estimate of the accuracy of the estimated position of the mobile station. In addition, for the case where the mobile station does not perform these operations, the BSS can provide the SMLC with the mobile station's transmission timing accuracy capability information received from the SGSN, thus allowing the SMLC to make an a priori assessment as to how many BTSs may be needed to reach the desired position accuracy and thus provide the mobile station with more accurate assistance information.

In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method in a mobile station that is configured to interact with a BSS, wherein the BSS includes a BTS. The method comprises a receiving step, an estimating step, and a transmitting step In the receiving step, the mobile station receives, from the BSS, a multilateration request. In the estimating step, the mobile station in response to receiving the multilateration request (i) estimates a synchronization accuracy with the BTS and (ii) estimates a transmission offset for uplink transmissions to the BTS. In the transmitting step, the mobile station transmits, to the BSS, a RLC data block that includes at least (i) a TLLI of the mobile station, (ii) the estimated synchronization accuracy, and (iii) the estimated transmission offset (note: the BSS subsequently relays this information to the SMLC). An advantage of the mobile station performing these steps is that it enables a SMLC to make a better estimate of the accuracy of the estimated position of the mobile station. In addition, for the case where the mobile station does not perform these steps, the BSS can provide the SMLC with the mobile station's transmission timing accuracy capability information received from the SGSN, thus allowing the SMLC to make an a priori assessment as to how many BTSs may be needed to reach the desired position accuracy and thus provide the mobile station with more accurate assistance information.

In yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a BSS which includes a BTS and is configured to interact with a mobile station. The BSS further comprises a processor and a memory that stores processor-executable instructions, wherein the processor interfaces with the memory to execute the processor-executable instructions, whereby the BSS is operable to perform a transmit operation and a receive operation. In the transmit operation, the BSS transmits, to the mobile station, a multilateration request. In the receive operation, the BSS receives, from the mobile station, a RLC data block that includes at least (i) a TLLI of the mobile station, (ii) an estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy, and (iii) an estimated mobile station transmission offset (note: the BSS subsequently relays this information to the SMLC). An advantage of the BSS performing these operations is that it enables a SMLC to make a better estimate of the accuracy of the estimated position of the mobile station. In addition, for the case where the BSS does not perform these operations, the BSS can provide the SMLC with the mobile station's transmission timing accuracy capability information received from the SGSN, thus allowing the SMLC to make an a priori assessment as to how many BTSs may be needed to reach the desired position accuracy and thus provide the mobile station with more accurate assistance information.

In still yet another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method in a BSS which includes a BTS and is configured to interact with a mobile station. The method comprises a transmitting step and a receiving step. In the transmitting step, the BSS transmits, to the mobile station, a multilateration request. In the receiving step, the BSS receives, from the mobile station, a RLC data block that includes at least (i) a TLLI of the mobile station, (ii) an estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy, and (iii) an estimated mobile station transmission offset (note: the BSS subsequently relays this information to the SMLC). An advantage of the BSS performing these steps is that it enables a SMLC to make a better estimate of the accuracy of the estimated position of the mobile station. In addition, for the case where the BSS does not perform these steps, the BSS can provide the SMLC with the mobile station's transmission timing accuracy capability information received from the SGSN, thus allowing the SMLC to make an a priori assessment as to how many BTSs may be needed to reach the desired position accuracy and thus provide the mobile station with more accurate assistance information.

Additional aspects of the present disclosure will be set forth, in part, in the detailed description, figures and any claims which follow, and in part will be derived from the detailed description, or can be learned by practice of the invention. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the present disclosure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more complete understanding of the present disclosure may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings:

FIG. 1 (PRIOR ART) is a diagram of an exemplary wireless communication network used to help explain a problem associated with the traditional multilateration process in determining a position of a mobile station;

FIG. 2 is a diagram of an exemplary wireless communication network which includes a SGSN, multiple SMLCs, multiple BSSs, and a mobile station which are configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 3 is a diagram used to describe a MS Transmission Offset which is calculated by the mobile station in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating one possible coding of a MS synchronization accuracy field which contains the mobile station estimated assessment of the BTS timing (i.e., the mobile station synchronization accuracy) in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating one possible coding of a MS Transmission Offset field which contains the MS Transmission Offset that the mobile station was forced to apply due to the transmission opportunities corresponding to the internal time base of the mobile station in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 6 illustrates details of a BSSMAP-LE PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST message with a MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 7 illustrates details of the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate details of a MS Radio Access Capability IE which includes the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates a Multilateration TA (MTA) IE which includes an overall BTS TA accuracy in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a method implemented in the mobile station in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 11 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of the mobile station configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method implemented in the BSS in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure; and

FIG. 13 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of the BSS configured in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A discussion is provided herein first to describe an exemplary wireless communication network 200 that includes multiple BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, a mobile station 204, and multiple SMLCs 206 ₁ and 206 ₂ configured to improve the accuracy in estimating a position of the mobile station 204 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure (see FIG. 2). Then, a discussion is provided to disclose various techniques that the BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, and the mobile station 204 can use to enable the serving SMLC 206 ₁ to improve the accuracy in estimating a position of the mobile station 204 in accordance with different embodiments of the present disclosure (see FIGS. 3-9). Thereafter, a discussion is provided to explain the basic functionalities-configurations of the mobile station 204 and the BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, each of which are configured to improve the accuracy in which the serving SMLC 206 ₁ can estimate a position of the mobile station 204 in accordance with different embodiments of the present disclosure (see FIGS. 10-13).

Exemplary Wireless Communication Network 200

Referring to FIG. 2, there is illustrated an exemplary wireless communication network 200 in accordance with the present disclosure. The wireless communication network 200 includes a core network (CN) 208 (which comprises at least one CN node 207 (e.g., SGSN 207)), multiple SMLCs 206 ₁ and 206 ₂, and multiple BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, (only three shown) which interface with a mobile station 204 (only one shown) (note: in practice there would be multiple mobile stations 204 but for clarity only one mobile station 204 is discussed herein). The wireless communication network 200 also includes many well-known components, but for clarity, only the components needed to describe the features of the present disclosure are described herein. Further, the wireless communication network 200 is described herein as being a GSM/EGPRS wireless communication network 200 which is also known as an EDGE wireless communication network 200. However, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the techniques of the present disclosure which are applied to the GSM/EGPRS wireless communication network 200 are generally applicable to other types of wireless communication systems, including, for example, EC-GSM, WCDMA, LTE, and WiMAX systems.

The wireless communication network 200 includes the BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (which are basically wireless access nodes 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, RAN nodes 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, wireless access points 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃) which can provide network access to the mobile station 204. Each BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ includes one or more BTSs 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ and a BSC 212 ₁, 212 ₂, 212 ₃. The BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ are connected to the core network 208 and, in particular, to the CN node 207 (e.g., SGSN 207). The core network 208 is connected to an external packet data network (PDN) 219, such as the Internet, and a server 213 (only one shown). The mobile station 204 may communicate with one or more servers 213 (only one shown) connected to the core network 208 and/or the PDN 219.

The mobile station 204 may be referred to generally as an end terminal (user) that attaches to the wireless communication network 200, and may refer to either a Machine Type Communications (MTC) device (e.g., a smart meter) or a non-MTC device. Further, the term “mobile station” is generally intended to be synonymous with the term mobile device, wireless device, “User Equipment,” or UE, as that term is used by 3GPP, and includes standalone mobile stations, such as terminals, cell phones, smart phones, tablets, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, cellular IoT devices, and wireless-equipped personal digital assistants, as well as wireless cards or modules that are designed for attachment to or insertion into another electronic device, such as a personal computer, electrical meter, etc. . . . .

The mobile station 204 may include a transceiver circuit 214 for communicating with the BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (RAN nodes 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃), and a processing circuit 216 for processing signals transmitted from and received by the transceiver circuit 214 and for controlling the operation of the mobile station 204. The transceiver circuit 214 may include a transmitter 218 and a receiver 220, which may operate according to any standard, e.g., the GSM/EDGE standard, and the EC-GSM standard. The processing circuit 216 may include a processor 222 and a memory 224 for storing program code for controlling the operation of the mobile station 204. The program code may include code for performing the procedures as described hereinafter.

Each BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ may include a transceiver circuit 226 ₁, 226 ₂, 226 ₃ for communicating with the mobile station 204 (typically multiple mobile stations 204—only one shown for clarity) and their respective BSC 212 ₁, 212 ₂, 212 ₃, a processing circuit 228 ₁, 228 ₂, 228 ₃ for processing signals transmitted from and received by the transceiver circuit 226 ₁, 226 ₂, 226 ₃ and for controlling the operation of the corresponding BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃. The transceiver circuit 226 ₁, 226 ₂, 226 ₃ may include a transmitter 230 ₁, 230 ₂, 230 ₃ and a receiver 232 ₁, 232 ₂, 232 ₃, which may operate according to any standard, e.g., the GSM/EDGE standard, and the EC-GSM standard. The processing circuit 228 ₁, 228 ₂, 228 ₃ may include a processor 234 ₁, 234 ₂, 234 ₃, and a memory 236 ₁, 236 ₂, 236 ₃ for storing program code for controlling the operation of the corresponding BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃. The program code may include code for performing the procedures as described hereinafter.

Each BSC 212 ₁, 212 ₂, 212 ₃ may include a transceiver circuit 238 ₁, 238 ₂, 238 ₃ for communicating with their respective BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ and SMLC 206 ₁, 206 ₂, a processing circuit 240 ₁, 240 ₂, 240 ₃ for processing signals transmitted from and received by the transceiver circuit 238 ₁, 238 ₂, 238 ₃ and for controlling the operation of the corresponding BSC 212 ₁, 212 ₂, 212 ₃, and a network interface 242 ₁, 242 ₂, 242 ₃ for communicating with the SGSN 207 part of the core network 208. The transceiver circuit 238 ₁, 238 ₂, 238 ₃ may include a transmitter 244 ₁, 244 ₂, 244 ₃ and a receiver 246 ₁, 246 ₂, 246 ₃, which may operate according to any standard, e.g., the GSM/EDGE standard (in this example), and the EC-GSM standard. The processing circuit 240 ₁, 240 ₂, 240 ₃ may include a processor 248 ₁, 248 ₂, 248 ₃, and a memory 250 ₁, 250 ₂, 250 ₃ for storing program code for controlling the operation of the corresponding BSC 212 ₁, 212 ₂, 212 ₃. The program code may include code for performing the procedures as described hereinafter. Note: for purposes of the discussion herein, it should be appreciated that the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ circuitry can be considered to be the same circuitry as BSC 212 ₁, 212 ₂, 212 ₃ (it should be appreciated that a BSS comprises a BSC and a BTS according to well-known prior art, so when there is a discussion herein about a BSS performing certain functions, it typically means the BSC performing those functions unless it is specifically mentioned that the BTS is performing a function).

The CN node 207 (e.g., SGSN 207, Mobility Management Entity (MME) 207) may include a transceiver circuit 252 for communicating with the BSSs 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃, a processing circuit 254 for processing signals transmitted from and received by the transceiver circuit 252 and for controlling the operation of the CN node 207, and a network interface 257 for communicating with the PDN 219 or the server 213. The transceiver circuit 252 may include a transmitter 256 and a receiver 258, which may operate according to any standard, e.g., the GSM/EDGE standard (in this example), and the EC-GSM standard. The processing circuit 254 may include a processor 260 and a memory 262 for storing program code for controlling the operation of the CN node 207. The program code may include code for performing the procedures as described hereinafter.

Techniques for Improving Accuracy of Mobile Station's Estimated Position

Brief Description

In accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure, the MS 204 when synchronizing to a BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ (three shown) also estimates the accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ by which it has synchronized to the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃. Further, the MS 204 also estimates a MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ with which it is able to time its uplink transmissions to the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃. The MS 204 reports (e.g., in an uplink Radio Link Control (RLC) data block 270 ₁, 270 ₂, 270 ₃) the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ and the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ associated with the respective BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ to the network (e.g., BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃). The BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) adjusts its estimated TA 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 272 ₃ for the MS 204 according to the indicated MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ and then forwards in a BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION message 275 ₁, 275 ₂, 275 ₃ (for example) the Adjusted Estimated Timing Advance 285 ₁, 285 ₂, 285 ₃ and the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ along with a corresponding BTS Timing Advance Accuracy 273 ₁, 273 ₂, 273 ₃. All three of these values 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃, 273 ₁, 273 ₂, 273 ₃, 285 ₁, 285 ₂, 285 ₃ are taken into account by the serving SMLC 206 ₁ when estimating the accuracy of the estimated position of the MS 204. Alternatively, in another embodiment of the present disclosure in order to address scenarios where the MS 204 is not able to provide an estimate of the MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁, instead there is provided to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ an a priori understanding of the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy capability, by having the serving BSS 202 ₁ use a field 266 (MS Transmission Timing Accuracy field 266) which can be added to a MS Radio Access Capability Information Element (IE) 267 and sent to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ (see 3GPP TS 24.008 v14.1.0 which discloses the traditional MS Radio Access Capability IE without the new MS Transmission Timing Accuracy field 266—the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference). The MS Transmission Timing Accuracy field 266 indicates (a) the worst case accuracy (guaranteed minimum accuracy) with which the MS 204 is able to estimate the timing of the BTS 210 ₁ according to signals received from the BTS 210 ₁ and (b) the worst case MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁. It is further proposed in yet another embodiment of the present disclosure that the serving BSS 202 ₁ passes either the complete MS Radio Access Capability IE 267 or the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy field 266 in a BSSMAP-LE PERFORM-LOCATION-REQUEST Protocol Data Unit (PDU) 269 to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ prior to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ triggering multilateration for the MS 204 (e.g., sending the MS 204 a multilateration request 272).

Moreover, in order for the serving SMLC 206 ₁ to be able to accurately assess the overall MS positioning accuracy, it could also utilize a BTS TA accuracy 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃. To this end, it is therefore proposed in another embodiment of the present disclosure to add a means for the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ to indicate its BTS's TA estimation capability 273 ₁, 273 ₂, 273 ₃ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ in a BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION message 275 ₁, 275 ₂, 275 ₃ either as a new IE or as part of the BSSLAP APDU (note 1: BSS 202 ₁ transmits its BTS TA estimation capability directly to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ within a BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION message 275 ₁; the BSS 202 ₂ first transmits its BTS TA estimation capability to the BSS 202 ₁ using inter-BSS communication, then the BSS 202 ₁ transmits the BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION message 275 ₂ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ (this signaling is not shown in FIG. 2); and the BSS 202 ₃ first transmits its BTS TA estimation capability to the BSS 202 ₁ using the core network (e.g., SGSN 207), and the BSS 202 ₁ then transmits the BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION message 275 ₃ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ (this signaling is not shown in FIG. 2)(note 2: FIG. 2 shows the direct (logical) transmission of the BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION MESSAGEs 275 ₂ and 275 ₃ from the BSSs 202 ₂ and 202 ₃ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁). Alternatively, the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) may take both the BTS Timing Advance Accuracy 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ and the MS Sync Accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ into account and report an overall Timing Advance Accuracy to the SMLC 206 ₁ (i.e., the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ processes the values of the BTS Timing Advance Accuracy 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ and MS Sync Accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ to arrive at a value for the overall Timing Advance Accuracy for the corresponding cell which the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ then passes to the SMLC 206 ₁). These embodiments of the present disclosure will be discussed in more detail hereinafter.

Detailed Description

As part of its procedure to time the uplink transmission to the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ according to signals received from the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃, the MS 204 first synchronizes to the network 200 (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃). In the synchronization process, the MS 204 estimates the synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ by which it has synchronized to the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ (note: the MS 204 will estimate a separate synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ for each BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃). For example, the MS 204 can estimate the synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ by performing multiple synchronizations and measurements of the timing of the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ and estimating the variance between these measurements. For instance, if N measurements of the timing are denoted t_(i), i=1, . . . , N, the variance of the individual measurement can be estimated using the well-known formula for unbiased sample variance:

$\begin{matrix} {s^{2} = {\frac{1}{N - 1}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\;\left( {t_{i} - \overset{\_}{t}} \right)^{2}}}} & \left( {{equation}\mspace{14mu}{{no}.\mspace{14mu} 1}} \right) \end{matrix}$

where t is the mean of t_(i), i.e.,

$\begin{matrix} {\overset{\_}{t} = {\frac{1}{N}{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\; t_{i}}}} & \left( {{equation}\mspace{14mu}{{no}.\mspace{14mu} 2}} \right) \end{matrix}$

Further, if the MS 204 finally estimates the timing of the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ as the mean of the individual measurements (i.e., by t), the variance of this timing estimate can be estimated by:

$\begin{matrix} {{{var}\left( \overset{\_}{t} \right)} = \frac{s^{2}}{N}} & \left( {{equation}\mspace{14mu}{{no}.\mspace{14mu} 3}} \right) \end{matrix}$

When synchronization is completed, the MS 204 will access the cell. However, the uplink transmission of the MS 204 when accessing the cell may not be perfectly time aligned with the timing of the signals from the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ as estimated during synchronization due to limitations in the design of the MS 204. For example, this limitation in the design of the MS 204 may be due to the internal time base of the MS 204 (to which transmissions must be time aligned) which may not be perfectly aligned with the estimated timing of the BTS transmissions. The internal time base used for uplink transmissions may be somewhat arbitrary as to when its corresponding uplink transmission opportunities (see upward pointing dashed arrows in FIG. 3) occur relative to the ability of the MS 204 to synchronize to downlink signals (e.g., Frequency Correction Channel (FCCH)/Synchronization Channel (SCH)/Extended Coverage-Synchronization Channel (EC-SCH)) received from the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃. This arbitrariness can be viewed as acceptable as long as the uplink transmission opportunities are spaced tightly enough (e.g., ¼ symbol) such that the worst case known offset introduced by the MS 204 when making an uplink transmission will be half the spacing of the transmission opportunities (e.g., ⅛ symbol). However, in cases where an enhanced level of positioning accuracy is needed, the offset imposed by using such an internal time base can still result in limitations regarding the accuracy with which the SMLC 206 ₁ can estimate the position of the MS 204. It is therefore desirable for the MS 204 to have knowledge of the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ it applied when performing the Multilateration Timing Advance (MTA) procedure in a given cell to be made available when the corresponding BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) attempts to determine the applicable value of the BTS timing advance 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ for the MS 204 in that cell.

In other words, by e.g., the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) not having access to MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ applicable when the MS 204 performed the MTA procedure in a given cell, there will be a forced misalignment of uplink transmissions that the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) will not be able to take into account. This will then contribute to the total TA estimation error (i.e., the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) will determine a value for the Estimated Timing Advance 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ but will not be able to determine a value for the Adjusted Estimated Timing Advance 285 ₁, 285 ₂, 285 ₃). See FIG. 3 where this problem is illustrated with the assumption that the uplink transmission opportunities associated with the used internal time base are spaced ¼ symbol apart. Based on signals from the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ (i.e., BTS true timing), the MS 204 estimates the downlink (DL) timing denoted as MS estimated DL timing. Now, due to limitations in the MS 204 (i.e., the internal time base imposed on all uplink transmissions) there is a difference between the MS Nominal UL Transmission opportunity (e.g., determined according to the MS estimated DL timing+3 time slot offset for the uplink) and the MS Selected Transmission opportunity (i.e., the closest internal time base uplink transmission opportunity which may occur either before or after the MS Nominal Transmission opportunity), denoted MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃. The present disclosure addresses this problem by having the MS 204 estimate and transmit the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ to each BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ as information included in the respective RLC data block 270 ₁, 270 ₂, 270 ₃.

Each BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ will perform a TA estimation 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ based on the signal sent by the MS 204 (e.g., an access request received on the EC-RACH or an uplink RLC data block received on an EC-PDTCH). In this process, the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ will estimate the accuracy by which it is able to measure the timing of signals received from the MS 204. From the accuracy (BTS timing advance accuracy 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃) estimated by the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ and the information (MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ and MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃) provided by the MS 204, a total accuracy of the TA estimation is derived. The BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) can further use the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ to directly compensate the Estimated Timing Advance (TA_(estimated)) value 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ as this is a known error in the MS 204, i.e., Adjusted Estimated Timing Advance (TA_(adjusted))=TA_(estimated)−MS Transmission Offset. Either of these separate accuracies or the total accuracy (i.e., the BTS processes the values of the BTS Timing Advance Accuracy 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ and the MS Sync Accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ to arrive at a value for the overall Timing Advance Accuracy for the corresponding cell) is delivered by the serving BSS 202 ₁ to the serving SMLC node 206 ₁. The serving SMLC node 206 ₁ combines accuracy estimates of TA estimates from multiple BTSs 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ to derive an estimate of the accuracy of the positioning of the MS 204.

It shall be noted to anyone skilled in the art that the principles described in the embodiments below also are applicable to other Radio Access technologies such as Long Term Evolution (LTE), Universal Mobile Telephony System (UMTS), Narrow Band Internet of Things (NB-IoT) and Enhanced Machine Type Communications (eMTC) where a communication device (a) estimates and adjusts (synchronizes) to the downlink timing of the network and (b) the uplink transmission of the communication device when accessing the network may not be perfectly time aligned with the timing of the signals from the network as estimated during synchronization.

In a first embodiment of the present disclosure, it is proposed, in addition to the Temporary Logical Link Identifier (TLLI) 274 (or other MS identity) of the MS 204, to also include the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ as well as the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁ respectively in two new fields called MS Sync Accuracy field 278 and the MS Transmission Offset field 290 in the Radio Link Control (RLC) data block 270 ₁ transmitted by the MS 204 on an uplink Temporary Block Flow (TBF) established in response to an access request 272 indicating Multilateration. In order for the BSS 202 ₁ (BTS 210 ₁) to extract the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁ from the uplink RLC data block 270 ₁, it is proposed that the MS 204 use a reserved length indicator 276, e.g., a length indicator 276 of value 122 in the RLC data block 270 ₁ (note that any of the unused length indicators may be used). Length indicators are used to delimit upper layer PDU but may also be used to indicate the presence of additional information within the RLC data block. One example is the length indicator with a value 125, which indicates the presence of dynamic timeslot reduction control information which shall be included after the last Upper Layer PDU (see 3GPP TS 44.060 V13.3.0 (2016 September)—the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein). In the case of Multilateration, it is proposed that a Length Indicator 276 of value 122 be used in the RLC data block 270 ₁ by the MS 204 to indicate the presence of the MS synchronization accuracy field 278 (which includes the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁) and the MS Transmission Offset field 290 (which includes the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁) in the first octet immediately following the Length Indicator 276. FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating one possible coding of the MS synchronization accuracy field 278 which contains the MS estimated assessment of the BTS 210 ₁ timing (i.e., the MS estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁) in units of 1/32 of a symbol period. FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating one possible coding of the MS Transmission Offset field 290 which contains the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁ which the MS 204 was forced to apply due to the transmission opportunities corresponding to the internal base in units of 1/32 of a symbol period. An alternative coding or field realizations may also be used.

In a second embodiment, it is proposed, in addition to the TLLI 274 (or other MS identity) of the MS 204 and the Source Identity 280 of the Serving BSS 202 ₁, to also include the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₂, 264 ₃ and the estimated uplink MS Transmission Offset 265 ₂, 265 ₃ in the RLC data blocks 270 ₂, 270 ₃ transmitted by the MS 204 on an uplink TBF established in response to an access request 272 indicating Multilateration. In order for the BSSs 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTSs 210 ₂, 210 ₃) to extract the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₂, 264 ₃ and the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₂, 265 ₃ from the uplink RLC data blocks 270 ₂, 270 ₃, it is proposed that the MS 204 uses a reserved length indicator 276, e.g., a length indicator 276 of value 122 within the RLC data blocks 270 ₂, 270 ₃. In the case of Multilateration, it is proposed that a Length Indicator 276 of value 122 is used in the RLC data blocks 270 ₂, 270 ₃ by the MS 204 to indicate the presence of the “Source Identity” field 281, MS synchronization accuracy field 278, and the MS Transmission Offset field 290 in the five octets immediately following the Length Indicator 276 (four octets for the Source Identity field 281, ½ octet for the MS synchronization accuracy field 278, and a ½ octet for the MS Transmission Offset field 290). The assumption of using four octets for the Source Identity field 281 can be seen as valid if it is always sufficient to provide two octets of Location Area Code (LAC) and two octets of Cell ID information for the source identity (i.e., if it can be assumed that only cells belonging to the same Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN) are used for positioning). However, the “Source Identity” field 281 could alternatively comprise Mobile Country Code (MCC)+Mobile Network Code (MNC)+LAC+Cell ID (i.e., a total of 7 octets) in order to address the case where knowledge of PLMN ID (MCC+MNC) is needed to forward the derived TA information 264 ₂, 264 ₃ and associated Cell ID information 280 from a non-serving BSS 202 ₂ and 202 ₃ to the serving BSS 202 ₁. For possible codings of the MS synchronization accuracy field 278 and the MS Transmission Offset field 290, see FIGS. 4 and 5.

In either the first embodiment or the second embodiment, it is proposed that the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) or the SMLC 206 ₁ uses the reported MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ to compensate the Estimated Timing Advance (TA_(estimated)) value 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ to arrive at an Adjusted Estimated Timing Advance (TA_(adjusted)) value 285 ₁, 285 ₂, 285 ₃ according to TA_(adjusted)=TA_(estimated)−MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃.

In a third embodiment, in order to address a scenario when there is no assessment of the MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁ from the MS 204 as the MTA procedure is performed in each cell, it is proposed to add means for the serving BSS 202 ₁ to pass a new field called the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 (which includes a total MS transmission accuracy derived from a worst case MS synchronization accuracy and a worst case MS Transmission Offset) to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ in the BSSMAP-LE PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST message 269 sent from the serving BSS 202 ₁ to the serving SMLC 206 ₁. In this case, the serving BSS 202 ₁ obtains the information carried in MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 from the MS Radio Access Capability Information Element (IE) 267 received from the SGSN 207 when the SGSN 207 commands the BSS 202 ₁ to perform the positioning procedure. FIG. 6 illustrates details of the BSSMAP-LE PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST message 269 with the new MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 (note: the reference to TABLE 9.1 3GPP TS 49.031 indicates that this table will be updated in the new standard to reflect the updated BSSMAP-LE PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST message 269 per the present disclosure). FIG. 7 illustrates details of the new MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 which is a variable length information element that is derived from a worst case MS synchronization accuracy and a worst case MS Transmission Offset (note 1: the reference to 10.34 3GPP TS 49.031 indicates that this figure will be updated in the new standard to reflect the new MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 per the present disclosure) (note 2: it is to be noted that the shown MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 is just an example and, to anyone skilled in the art, various variations of the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 are possible such as a different range or that a 4 bit field with smaller steps in granularity can be used). For example, if the worst case MS synchronization accuracy is ⅛ symbol and the worst case MS Transmission Offset is ⅛ symbol, this results in a total MS Transmission Timing Accuracy of ¼ symbol. Alternatively, the serving BSS 202 ₁ using a field 266 (MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266) that indicates the worst case synchronization accuracy of MS 204 and the worst case MS transmission offset is added to the MS Radio Access Capability IE 267 which can be forwarded from the BSS 202 ₁ to the SMLC 206 ₁ as received by the BSS 202 ₁ from the SGSN 207. FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate details of the MS Radio Access Capability IE 267 with the new MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 (note: the reference to TABLE 10.5.146 3GPP TS 24.008 indicates that this table will be updated in the new standard to reflect the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 per the present disclosure). In yet another alternative, the complete MS Radio Access Capability IE 267 is sent as a new IE in the BSSMAP-LE PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST message 269 or the MS Transmission Timing Accuracy Capability IE 266 is added to the Classmark Information Type 3 message already optionally included in the BSSMAP-LE PERFORM LOCATION REQUEST message 269.

In a fourth embodiment, in order for the serving SMLC 206 ₁ to know the overall accuracy of the estimation of the TA 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃, it is proposed to add means for the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ (BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃) to indicate an overall TA estimation accuracy to the serving SMLC 206 ₁ in the BSSMAP-LE CONNECTION ORIENTED INFORMATION message 275 ₁, 275 ₂, 275 ₃, either as a new IE or as part of the BSSLAP APDU. FIG. 9 is a diagram that illustrates where a new 3GPP TS 49.031 Multilateration TA (MTA) IE 277 is proposed to carry the overall Timing Advance estimation accuracy (bits 2 to 4 of octet 2), which indicates the overall timing advance estimation symbol granularity derived by the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ taking its own TA accuracy (i.e., the BTS Timing Advance Accuracy 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃) as well as the MS estimated accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ of the timing of the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ (i.e., the estimated MS synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃) into account. Alternatively, the same information could also have been included in the BSSLAP APDU as a new 3GPP 48.071 Multilateration Timing Advance (MTA) message.

Basic Functionalities-Configurations of the MS 204 and the BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃

Referring to FIG. 10, there is a flowchart of a method 1000 implemented in the mobile station 204 that is configured to interact with BSS 202 ₁ (the serving BSS 202 ₁) which includes BTS 210 ₁ (for example) in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. At step 1002, the mobile station 204 receives, from the BSS 202 ₁, a multilateration request 272 (note: the serving SMLC 206 ₁ originally transmits the multilateration request 272 which is then transmitted by the BSS 202 ₁ to the mobile station 204). At step 1004, the mobile station 204 estimates a synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ with the BTS 210 ₁ and estimates a transmission offset 265 ₁ for uplink transmissions to the BTS 210 ₁ in response to receiving the multilateration request 272. For instance, the mobile station 204 can estimate the synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ with the BTS 210 ₁ by performing multiple timing measurements of the BTS 210 ₁ and estimating a variance between the timing measurements of the BTS 210 ₁ (note: the variance can be estimated as discussed above with respect to equation nos. 1-3). Plus, the mobile station 204 can estimate the transmission offset 265 ₁ by taking into account limitations of an internal time base and estimated timing of transmissions (e.g., with the SCH or the EC-SCH) from the BTS 210 ₁ (see discussion above with respect to FIG. 3). At step 1006, the mobile station 204 transmits, to the BSS 202 ₁, a RLC data block 270 ₁ that includes at least (i) a TLLI 274 of the mobile station 204, (ii) the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, and (iii) the estimated transmission offset 265 ₁. The RLC data block 270 ₁ may further include (iv) a Source Identity 280 of the BSS 202 ₁, and (v) a length indicator 276 to indicate a presence of the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the transmission offset 265 ₁. It should be appreciated that the mobile station 204 would also perform at least steps 1004 and 1006 with the non-serving BSSs 202 ₂ and 202 ₃.

Referring to FIG. 11, there is a block diagram illustrating structures of an exemplary mobile station 204 in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, the mobile station 204 comprises a receive module 1102, an estimate module 1104, and a transmit module 1106. The receive module 1102 is configured to receive from a BSS 202 ₁ (for example) a multilateration request 272. The estimate module 1104 is configured, in response to receipt of the multilateration request 272, to estimate a synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ with the BTS 210 ₁ and to estimate a transmission offset 265 ₁ for uplink transmissions to the BTS 210 ₁. The transmit module 1106 is configured to transmit, to the BSS 202 ₁, a RLC data block 270 ₁ that includes at least (i) a TLLI 274 of the mobile station 204, (ii) the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, and (iii) the estimated transmission offset 265 ₁. The RLC data block 270 ₁ may further include (iv) a Source Identity 280 of the BSS 202 ₁, and (v) a length indicator 276 to indicate a presence of the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the transmission offset 265 ₁. It should be noted that the mobile station 204 may also include other components, modules or structures which are well-known, but for clarity, only the components, modules or structures needed to describe the features of the present disclosure are described herein.

As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the above-described modules 1102, 1104, and 1106 of the mobile station 204 may be implemented separately as suitable dedicated circuits. Further, the modules 1102, 1104, and 1106 can also be implemented using any number of dedicated circuits through functional combination or separation. In some embodiments, the modules 1102, 1104, and 1106 may be even combined in a single application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). As an alternative software-based implementation, the mobile station 204 may comprise a memory 224, a processor 222 (including but not limited to a microprocessor, a microcontroller or a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), etc.) and a transceiver 214. The memory 224 stores machine-readable program code executable by the processor 222 to cause the mobile station 204 to perform the steps of the above-described method 1000.

Referring to FIG. 12, there is a flowchart of a method 1200 implemented in the BSS 202 ₁ (for example) which includes BTS 210 ₁ (for example) and is configured to interact with mobile station 204 and SMLC 206 ₁ in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. At step 1202, the BSS 202 ₁ transmits, to the mobile station 204, a multilateration request 272 (note: the serving SMLC 206 ₁ originally transmits the multilateration request 272 which is then transmitted by the BSS 202 ₁ to the mobile station 204). At step 1204, the BSS 202 ₁ receives, from the mobile station 204, a RLC data block 270 ₁ that includes at least (i) a TLLI 274 of the mobile station 204, (ii) an estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ (wherein the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ indicates an estimate by the mobile station 204 of an accuracy by which the mobile station 204 is synchronized to the BTS 210 ₁), and (iii) a mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁ (wherein the mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁ is determined by the MS 204 by taking into account limitations of an internal time base and estimated timing of transmissions from the BTS 210 ₁). The RLC data block 270 ₁ may further include (iv) a Source Identity 280 of the BSS 202 ₁, and (v) a length indicator 276 to indicate a presence of the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the transmission offset 265 ₁. At optional step 1206, the BSS 202 ₁ obtains a BTS TA estimation 271 ₁ for the mobile station 204 calculated by the BTS 210 ₁ based on the received RLC data block 270 ₁. At optional step 1208, the BSS 202 ₁ adjusts the BTS TA estimation 271 ₁ according to the mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁ (e.g., the BSS 202 ₁ can adjust the BTS TA estimation 271 ₁ per the following: the adjusted TA estimation (TA_(adjusted))=the TA estimation (TA_(estimated)) minus the mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁). At optional step 1210, the BSS 202 ₁ transmits, to the SMLC 206 ₁, the adjusted BTS TA estimation 285 ₁, the estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, and the BTS TA accuracy 273 ₁. It should be appreciated that the BSSs 202 ₂ and 202 ₃ would also perform at least step 1204 with the mobile station 204, and possibly optional steps 1206, 1208, and 1210.

Referring to FIG. 13, there is a block diagram illustrating structures of an exemplary BSS 202 ₁ (for example) in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. In one embodiment, the BSS 202 ₁ comprises a first transmit module 1302, a receive module 1304, an optional obtain module 1306, an optional adjust module 1308, and an optional second transmit module 1310. The first transmit module 1302 is configured to transmit, to the mobile station 204, a multilateration request 272. The receive module 1304 is configured to receive, from the mobile station 204, a RLC data block 270 ₁ that includes at least (i) a TLLI 274 of the mobile station 204, (ii) an estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ (wherein the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ indicates an estimate by the mobile station 204 of an accuracy by which the mobile station 204 is synchronized to the BTS 210 ₁), and (iii) a mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁ (wherein the mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁ is determined by the MS 204 by taking into account limitations of an internal time base and estimated timing of transmissions from the BTS 210 ₁). The RLC data block 270 ₁ may further include (iv) a Source Identity 280 of the BSS 202 ₁, and (v) a length indicator 276 to indicate a presence of the estimated synchronization accuracy 264 ₁ and the transmission offset 265 ₁. The optional obtain module 1306 is configured to obtain a BTS TA estimation 271 ₁ for the mobile station 204 calculated by the BTS 210 ₁ based on the received RLC data block 270 ₁. The optional adjust module 1308 is configured to adjust the BTS TA estimation 271 ₁ according to the mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁ (e.g., the BSS 202 ₁ can adjust the BTS TA estimation 271 ₁ per the following: the adjusted TA estimation (TA_(adjusted))=the TA estimation (TA_(estimated)) minus the mobile station transmission offset 265 ₁). The optional second transmit module 1310 is configured to transmit, to the SMLC 206 ₁, the adjusted BTS TA estimation 285 ₁, the estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy 264 ₁, and the BTS TA accuracy 2′731. It should be noted that the BSS 202 ₁ may also include other components, modules or structures which are well-known, but for clarity, only the components, modules or structures needed to describe the features of the present disclosure are described herein.

As those skilled in the art will appreciate, the above-described modules 1302, 1304, 1306, 1308, and 1310 of the BSS 202 ₁ may be implemented separately as suitable dedicated circuits. Further, the modules 1302, 1304, 1306, 1308, and 1310 can also be implemented using any number of dedicated circuits through functional combination or separation. In some embodiments, the modules 1302, 1304, 1306, 1308, and 1310 may be even combined in a single application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). As an alternative software-based implementation, the BSS 202 ₁ may comprise a memory 250 ₁, a processor 248 ₁ (including but not limited to a microprocessor, a microcontroller or a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), etc.) and a transceiver 238 ₁. The memory 250 ₁ stores machine-readable program code executable by the processor 248 ₁ to cause the BSS 202 ₁ to perform the steps of the above-described method 1200. Note: the other BSSs 202 ₂ and 202 ₃ may be configured the same as BSS 202 ₁.

In view of the foregoing disclosure, it will be readily appreciated that it is beneficial for the serving SMLC 206 ₁ to receive cell specific timing advance information that is supplemented with MS Synchronization Accuracy information 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ that indicates the guaranteed minimum accuracy with which the MS 204 is able to synchronize to signals received from the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ and time its uplink transmissions accordingly. It should also be appreciated that another problem addressed herein by the disclosed techniques is that the possible timing of MS 204 uplink transmissions may be restricted by the MS implementation, e.g., by an internal time base to which uplink transmissions made by the MS 204 must be aligned, and whose phase cannot be adjusted. This means that MS 204 implementations that force uplink transmissions to align with such an internal time base will commonly result is an offset in the timing of the MS transmissions, relative to (case a) the estimated timing of the signals received from the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ for the case of e.g., an access attempt sent on the Random Access Channel (RACH)/Extended Coverage-Random Access Channel (EC-RACH) or (case b) the timing advance information sent from a BSS 202 ₁, 202 ₂, 202 ₃ to an MS 204 in response to e.g., an access request sent by the MS 204 on the RACH/EC-AGCH. In other words, MS uplink transmissions will not be made according to the MS Synchronization Accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ alone per (case a) according to the MS Synchronization Accuracy 264 ₁, 264 ₂, 264 ₃ plus an indicated timing advance as per (case b), but may also be subject to an offset, herein called the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁,265 ₂, 265 ₃, that the MS 204 is aware of but unable to correct. Further, the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ (or the SMLC 206 ₁) can use the MS Transmission Offset 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 to directly compensate the Estimated BTS Timing Advance value 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ in order to derive a more accurate value referred to herein as an Adjusted BTS Estimated Timing Advance value 285 ₁, 285 ₂, 285 ₃. As such it will be beneficial for the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ to receive “MS Transmission Offset” information 265 ₁, 265 ₂, 265 ₃ from the MS 204 whenever it performs the positioning procedure in a given cell, thereby allowing e.g., the BTS 210 ₁, 210 ₂, 210 ₃ to adjust its “Estimated Timing Advance” 271 ₁, 271 ₂, 271 ₃ for that MS 204 so that an “Adjusted Estimated Timing Advance” 285 ₁, 285 ₂, 285 ₃ can be determined and relayed to the serving SMLC 206 ₁.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the use of the term “exemplary” is used herein to mean “illustrative,” or “serving as an example,” and is not intended to imply that a particular embodiment is preferred over another or that a particular feature is essential. Likewise, the terms “first” and “second,” and similar terms, are used simply to distinguish one particular instance of an item or feature from another, and do not indicate a particular order or arrangement, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Further, the term “step,” as used herein, is meant to be synonymous with “operation” or “action.” Any description herein of a sequence of steps does not imply that these operations must be carried out in a particular order, or even that these operations are carried out in any order at all, unless the context or the details of the described operation clearly indicates otherwise.

Of course, the present disclosure may be carried out in other specific ways than those herein set forth without departing from the scope and essential characteristics of the invention. One or more of the specific processes discussed above may be carried out in a cellular phone or other communications transceiver comprising one or more appropriately configured processing circuits, which may in some embodiments be embodied in one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs). In some embodiments, these processing circuits may comprise one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers, and/or digital signal processors programmed with appropriate software and/or firmware to carry out one or more of the operations described above, or variants thereof. In some embodiments, these processing circuits may comprise customized hardware to carry out one or more of the functions described above. The present embodiments are, therefore, to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.

Although multiple embodiments of the present disclosure have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it should be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments, but instead is also capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications and substitutions without departing from the present disclosure that as has been set forth and defined within the following claims. 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A base station subsystem (BSS) configured to interact with a mobile station and a Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC), wherein the BSS includes a base transceiver station (BTS), the BSS comprising: a processor; and, a memory that stores processor-executable instructions, wherein the processor interfaces with the memory to execute the processor-executable instructions, whereby the BSS is operable to: transmit, to the mobile station, a multilateration request; and, receive, from the mobile station, a Radio Link Control (RLC) data block that includes at least (i) a Temporary Logical Link Identifier (TLLI) of the mobile station, (ii) an estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy, and (iii) a mobile station transmission offset.
 2. The BSS of claim 1, wherein the BSS is further operable to: obtain a timing advance (TA) estimation for the mobile station calculated by the BTS based on the received RLC data block; adjust the TA estimation according to the mobile station transmission offset; and transmit, to the SMLC, the adjusted TA estimation, the estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy, and a BTS TA accuracy.
 3. The BSS of claim 2, wherein the BSS performs the adjust operation per the following: the adjusted TA estimation (TA_(adjusted))=the TA estimation (TA_(estimated)) minus the mobile station transmission offset.
 4. The BSS of claim 1, wherein the RLC data block further includes a Source Identity of the BSS.
 5. The BSS of claim 1, wherein the RLC data block further includes a length indicator to indicate a presence of the estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy and the mobile station transmission offset.
 6. A method in a base station subsystem (BSS) configured to interact with a mobile station and a Serving Mobile Location Center (SMLC), wherein the BSS includes a base transceiver station (BTS), the method comprising: transmitting, to the mobile station, a multilateration request; and, receiving, from the mobile station, a Radio Link Control (RLC) data block that includes at least (i) a Temporary Logical Link Identifier (TLLI) of the mobile station, (ii) an estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy, and (iii) a mobile station transmission offset.
 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising: obtaining a timing advance (TA) estimation for the mobile station calculated by the BTS based on the received RLC data block; adjusting the TA estimation according to the mobile station transmission offset; and transmitting, to the SMLC node, the adjusted TA estimation, the estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy, and a BTS TA accuracy.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the adjusting step is performed as follows: the adjusted TA estimation (TA_(adjusted))=the TA estimation (TA_(estimated)) minus the mobile station transmission offset.
 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the RLC data block further includes a Source Identity of the BSS.
 10. The method of claim 6, wherein the RLC data block further includes a length indicator to indicate a presence of the estimated mobile station synchronization accuracy and the mobile station transmission offset. 